HOLY FAMILY (2015)
(Ecclelsiasticus 3:2-6, 12-14; Colossians 3:12-21; Luke 2:41-52)
“Son, why
have you done this to us? Your father
and I have been looking for you with great anxiety.” And He said to them, “Why were you looking
for Me? Did you not know that I must be
in My Father’s house?” But they did not
understand what He said to them.
Let us
first of all remark how the Holy Family exemplified the teaching we have heard
in the two previous readings: Mary
herself showed honour and respect for Joseph in her words and attitude:
Son, why
have you done this? Your father and I
have been looking for you with great anxiety.
Joseph,
for his part, showed humble reverence and love for Mary by allowing her to
speak first, thus finding immediate emotional relief in her sovereign maternal
solicitude for her Son.
Jesus
too, first of all recognizes and commiserates with Mary and Joseph’s concern
with gentle words of sympathy:
Why were
you looking for me (upsetting yourselves so much)?
Then He
proceeded to make clear, as best He could, what had been going on in His heart
and mind recently:
Did you
not know that I must be in My Father’s house … for
none but my heavenly Father could possibly lead Me to absent Myself from
returning with you in the caravan … surely you knew that?
The Boy
Jesus – humanly speaking, He was still a boy in some most important aspects –
possibly did not fully realize the impact of those words! And yet, for the very first time He had
called the God of Israel -- Whom they all, in accordance with Israel’s Law, had
been on pilgrimage in Jerusalem to worship and honour in the Temple – His own, Personal, Father!
Those
words I must be in My Father’s house
are also seriously translated I must be
about My Father’s business: neither translation excludes the other, neither
alone can give the full meaning of Jesus’ words.
Moreover,
in the intimate inner circle of family life His words were also surprising,
perhaps even disturbing, since they could have appeared to be in contradiction
with Mary’s carefully chosen ‘adult’ words:
Your father and I
have been looking for you with great anxiety.
There had
always been in the hearts and minds of Mary and Joseph – amid the wondrous
amazement, gratitude, and countless joys Jesus gave them – a hidden anxiety
about how best to bring up such a Child: One they had both taken, many years
ago, to the Temple to present Him originally to God as Mary’s God-given
son. They had both endeavoured to live
their lives in His sight and for His guidance, as true Israelites. Without doubt, Mary’s every word and gesture
as she lived her busy round of family, social, and religious duties bespoke her
love of God and commitment to Israel’s faith, and she must – frequently -- have
shared with her Son her most intimate thoughts and experiences of the great
goodness, wondrous beauty, and awesome justice, of God. Joseph, likewise, had his own indispensable
role and function to fulfil: he had to be the man for this sublime Boy: teaching
Him responsibility in His work for and relationships with others, above all
with and for His mother. It was by
following Joseph’s example that Jesus learned how to love the person and
appreciate the sensitivity of Mary, whilst at the same time fitting into the
world of working men and gradually advancing in His God-given ‘favour’ among
them. Joseph would also have taken Him
regularly (Sabbath, and market days Monday and Thursday) to the synagogue for
readings and explanation of the Law and prophets, together with common prayers
(Sh’ma – Hear O Israel, the Lord our
God is One); and it was at the synagogue that Jesus learnt to hear and
understand, to read and write, the holy language of His people.
That
teaching from Mary and Joseph, that early lived experience of faithful Jewish
practice over the years of His hidden home life in Nazareth culminated in this
pilgrimage to Jerusalem and came to its most beautiful first flowering in the
short period of three days when He was
alone there in response to and communing with His ‘newly-experienced’ Father in
heaven.
During
those three days, what was the business that Jesus was about, engaged in, that
He found so important and demanding? He was celebrating His new majority,
adult-standing and responsibility before the Law, which enabled Him above all
to delight more fully in God His Father: through participation in the Temple
worship, and then sharing in the regular teaching and discussion sessions --
given, held, by scribes and elders in the adjacent Temple:
After
three days they found Him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the teachers,
listening to them and asking them questions, and all who heard Him were
astounded at His understanding and His answers.
Notice
that this love of the boy-become-man-according-to-the-Law, this love of Jesus
for His Father in heaven was an intensely personal and deeply passionate
love. It was not a distant admiration
and compartmentalized commitment, one that could be appreciated objectively and
weighed in the scales against other loves and other, corresponding, commitments. No! It
was a passionate and compelling love which brooked no compare. This consuming love of the boy Jesus ‘for
His Father’s business’ had been originally nourished by the teaching of His
mother Mary, for she undoubtedly taught Him much about the Psalms of Israel and
the words of the prophets calling for love and obedience toward God and
fellow-feeling in community and society.
It was, however, above all her humility that was ever a beacon for Him
Who would eventually sacrifice Himself for the sins of men.
This Child absorbed the teaching of
His mother to such an extent that He understood the Psalms of which she spoke
so well, far, far more than she was aware of!
He learnt to read the sacred Scriptures she honoured and treasured with
such sympathetic awareness and profound responsiveness that they became for Him
a personal communion with the Author of those Scriptures, a communion wherein
the Boy ‘discovered’ Himself and was guided to that appreciation of His Father
which the Scriptures themselves (Isaiah 55:11s.) foretold:
My Word
that goes forth from My mouth shall not return to Me empty, but shall do what
pleases Me, achieving the end for which I sent it.
The Boy’s
subsequent awareness and understanding of His adulthood -- His ‘bar mitsva’
acceptation before the Law; His experience of adult worship in His Father’s
house, and listening to and participating in the glorification of Israel’s God
‘in the midst of teachers’; all this was greater than anything He had
previously experienced. He was
enraptured ... experiencing for the very first time to the fullness of His
youthful being, His own most Personal nature: Son – totally from and totally
committed to – His only Father, in
Heaven. He quite literally could not
turn from the overwhelming fullness of that divine experience to join the
caravan with Mary and Joseph back to Nazareth ... He remained three days in
Jerusalem.
However,
this young Man’s sublime delight in and total commitment to His now
to-be-openly-acknowledged Father was not quite the same thing as His adult
‘commissioning’ by the Father for His ultimate mission. His human understanding was still developing
and so -- as was fitting for One still subject in society to His earthly
parents -- the words of Mary, with Joseph’s backing, had weight enough to call
Him back to an objective appreciation of His obligations as ‘their’ child. When such obligations would be removed,
however, His delighting in, loving and communing with, His heavenly Father,
would inevitably take over His whole life and claim His total and absolute
commitment. In the meantime, He had made
clear the essential point:
Did you
not know that I must be in My Father’s house ... about My Father’s work?
It was by
observing His mother Mary’s attitude and bearing that Jesus had learnt to
respect Joseph as His earthly father; nevertheless, Mary and Joseph, when the
time had come, were both taken totally unawares by Jesus’ behaviour at that
year’s pilgrimage to Jerusalem for the Passover celebrations. There had always been a certain silence,
otherness, about Jesus … didn’t His disciples experience it as they used to
walk together behind Jesus as they went about Israel with Him? Words were not cheap with Jesus, nor were His
thoughts, feelings, and emotions easily traceable and recognizable … He was
‘his own man’ as a common expression would put it. But that is not correct, not accurate,
enough, for Jesus was ‘God’s man’, above all and in all He was ‘His Father’s
Son’. However, we are told that He
learned to control His enthusiasm, to listen more patiently and ever more
attentively to and for His heavenly Father, and so:
He went down with Mary and Joseph and came to Nazareth, and was obedient
to them.
Oh the
humility of God made man! He went back
to family life in Nazareth and was obedient: He would calmly love and reverence
His earthly parents as He awaited His Father to call Him, to ‘commission’ Him. Learning ever more of God His Father, He
continued to humble Himself before the men and women He served in His
recognized work as carpenter with Joseph, to respect those among whom He dwelt,
and in all such relationships to quietly encourage and confirm their awareness
of God as He shared with them His understanding and Truth, His goodness and
Love:
Jesus
advanced (in) wisdom and age and favour before God and man.