If you are looking at a particular sermon and it is removed it is because it has been updated.

For example Year C 2010 is being replaced week by week with Year C 2013, and so on.

Friday 5 November 2021

32nd Sunday Year B 2021

 

32nd. Sunday (Year B)

(1 Kings 17:10-16; Hebrews 9:24-28; Mark 12:38-44)

 

The Temple in Jerusalem and the synagogues spread throughout the country were two very distinct aspects of the worship of God in Israel.  The ‘latest version’, so to speak, of the Temple was -- in Our Lord’s time -- the magnificent, world-famous, Herodian Temple in Jerusalem, built by Herod -- a non-Jewish Procurator of Judea -- to curry favour with his Jewish subjects.  As a building, it was Herod’s pride and joy, meriting him the appellation ‘the Great’: it was indeed both the glory of Israel and the envy of nations world-wide.  But it won no favour for Herod with his Jewish, Law-observing subjects, despite the fact that they used its splendour as the national centre for official Jewish, centuries-old, sacrificial worship carried out in accordance with the Law given by God to Moses.  The synagogue, on the other hand, was a more recent institution: a humble, local centre in Jewish towns and villages everywhere, a religious centre for devout, non-sacrificial, worship of Israel’s God, serving the exigencies of the Law -- especially the Ten Commandments -- given by  God, through Moses, as a covenant with Israel, a covenant to be known, understood and loved, by the people thanks to the Scribes knowledge and understanding of the Torah itself, the inspirations of God-sent prophets, and the witness of Israel’s history of blessings, unfaithfulness, suffering, penance and renewal.  The synagogue was, moreover, a house of mutual comfort and strength in local communities throughout the country and wherever Jews had been sent or congregated together.

Priests served in the prestigious Temple in Jerusalem where, every year, hundreds of thousands would come from abroad to worship at the great festivals: worship centred on the glorification of the God of Israel and the offering of satisfaction -- according to the Law -- for Israel’s national sin and for the sins of individuals. Scribes were scholars, more to be associated with the quiet synagogue assemblies where worship was directed expressly to the spiritual advancement of the Jewish people in their understanding of, and obedience to, God’s will and purpose for His Chosen People, as expressed in the Torah or Law.

Robes were both acceptable and required for priests; they were something of an affectation for Scribes:

Beware of the scribes, who like to go around in long robes and accept greetings in the marketplaces, seats of honour in the synagogues, and places of honour at banquets.  

The Priests were dressed as God’s servants and ministers for public ceremony and religious splendour.  The Scribes, however, outside the capital Jerusalem, were local teachers, helping the ordinary people in their understanding of the Law and the virtue needed to obey it.   Affectations in Scribes – like wearing those long robes mentioned in our Gospel reading -- easily developed into ostentation, and, since personal expenditure was needed to sustain it, it does not surprise us to learn that the Scribes were keen on money.; however, the criminality deserving of Jesus’ promised ‘severe condemnation’, only came when such love of money led them so far astray as to take advantage of the most vulnerable in society:

They devour the houses of widows.

From then on, their religion became nothing more than an empty shell:

Reciting lengthy prayers as a (mere) pretext.

The Temple Priests, the Scribes and their close associates the Pharisees, were all worshippers of the one true God of Israel in their diverse ways, and so too -- but in a non-religious way -- were numerous wealthy Israelites (remember the rich young man who came to Jesus?) who, believing their riches were a special gift/reward from God put, as today’s Gospel reading tells us, generous donations into the Temple treasury.  It was  these latter worshippers whom Jesus, in order to teach His disciples what He considered to be most important, compared with the unknown widow, who also ‘donation-worshipped’ God but in a truly sublime way: without any ostentation, and without any reservations either, putting her whole living in the collection box of the Temple:

Jesus sat down opposite the treasury and observed how the crowd put money into the treasury.   Many rich people put in large sums.  A poor widow also came and put in two mites, which make a quadrans.  Calling His disciples to Himself He said to them, "Amen, I say to you, this poor widow put in more than all the other contributors to the treasury.  For they have all contributed from their surplus wealth, but she, from her poverty, has contributed all she had, her whole livelihood."

She required no respectful greeting, she sought no special honours.  Unnoticed and unappreciated, probably quite unknown, she treasured what the wealthy donors only appreciated, and what the Scribes were at times tempted to abuse, God’s goodness and majesty; and the money those treasured to their own ruin, she -- totally forgetful of herself -- converted into divine currency: unfeigned charity, to her own great reward.

Jesus pointed her out as a model for admiration and imitation to His disciples, and through His Church He still puts her example before us, His present-day disciples, and that deserves our most careful notice and deep consideration as Christians and Catholics.

Modern critics of religious attitudes and others proud to think of themselves as radicals, faced with those two semi-parabolic stories from the Gospel would most likely conclude, first of all, that religious persons, as such, should not be given official marks of respect, places of honour, because their prayer – public and private – is probably hypocritical and certainly deluded; while from the second story they will not dream of celebrating the woman’s self-forgetfulness and total dedication to God but rather condemn her for thus jettisoning her life-resources.

Let me, therefore, recall to your mind the first reading in which the Lord performed a great miracle for Elijah and a starving woman of Zarephath:

“Do not be afraid,” Elijah said to her. “Go and do as you propose.   But first make me a little cake and bring it to me. Then you can prepare something for yourself and your son.”

Here is another story concerning Elijah, the great prophet who appeared to Our Lord together with Moses on the Mount of Transfiguration:

The king sent to (Elijah) a captain of fifty with his fifty men. So, he went up to Elijah sitting on the top of a hill. And he spoke to him: "Man of God, the king has said, 'Come down!'"  So, Elijah answered and said to the captain of fifty, "If I am a man of God, then let fire come down from heaven and consume you and your fifty men." And fire came down from heaven and consumed him and his fifty.

(And exactly the same happened a second time.)

Again, he sent a third captain of fifty with his fifty men. And the third captain of fifty went up, and came and fell on his knees before Elijah, and pleaded with him, and said to him: "Man of God, please let my life and the life of these fifty servants of yours be precious in your sight.  Look, fire has come down from heaven and burned up the first two captains of fifties with their fifties. But let my life now be precious in your sight."  And the angel of the LORD said to Elijah, "Go down with him; do not be afraid of him." So, he arose and went down with him to the king. (2 Kings 1:9ss.)

The king was showing total disregard and disrespect for the God of Israel and disdain for His prophet, who was to be dragged like some malefactor into the king’s presence.  The Lord, however, wanted Elijah to be shown respect and you have heard the result.  The Scribe liked, and in his way demanded, respect; Elijah expected and accepted it.  Why was one so very right and the other totally wrong?

The Scribe was wrong in his attitude because he sought and delighted in respectful greetings for his own person!   Elijah wanted respect as the Lord’s prophet not for his own person: “I am the prophet of the Lord, the God of Israel, Who has chosen me.  Have respect for the Lord’s prophet.   But as for myself, I am no better than my fathers.”

Elijah had the personal courage and reverential love for God to demand respect as a prophet of the Lord God of Israel in the face of royal autocracy; and when an unknown, God-guided widow, had the humility and devotion to freely accord him great respect, he was able to save her and the whole of Israel in time of drought and famine:

She said, "As the LORD your God lives, I have nothing baked; there is only a handful of flour in my jar, and a little oil in my jug.  Just now I was collecting a couple of sticks, to go in and prepare something for myself and my son; when we have eaten it, we shall die."  Elijah said to her, "Do not be afraid. Go and do as you propose.  But first make me a little cake and bring it to me.  Then you can prepare something for yourself and your son. For the LORD, the God of Israel, says: 'The jar of flour shall not go empty, nor the jug of oil run dry, until the day when the LORD sends rain upon the earth.'"  She left and did as Elijah had said.   She was able to eat for a year, and he and her son as well.   The jar of flour did not go empty, nor the jug of oil run dry, as the Lord had foretold through Elijah.

How long might that famine have continued in Israel had that destitute widow not shown such respect for God’s servant?

The two women in today’s readings were prodigal with themselves in their respect and reverence for God; for the widow of Zarephath, God, through Elijah, most wonderfully rewarded such respect and reverence; as for the ‘poor widow’ in the Temple, we have heard how Jesus appreciated her gift, and we have undoubting faith that God, the Father of Jesus, with like appreciation, rewarded and glorified her beyond measure.

Now let me quote words of Jesus uttered before our Gospel story:

Whoever wishes to come after Me must deny himself, take up his cross, and follow Me.  For whoever wishes to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake and that of the Gospel will save it.    (Mark 8: 3-35)

There Jesus expresses in general terms, for all His future disciples, what He had admiringly allowed one particularly chosen and uniquely endowed woman to exemplify.  Our trouble today is that some disciples are in danger of seeking to rob the Faith of any mystery, or any demands, above ordinary understanding; to apologize for whatever cannot be immediately and easily explained.  God’s words, however, are words of divine wisdom and sublime truth, expressing heavenly, eternal, love, and we should not try to turn them into milk, saccharine, and water, with pseudo, popularity-seeking, ‘explanations’.  We must never forget Jesus’ further words:

Whoever is ashamed of Me and of My words in this faithless and sinful generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of when He comes in His Father’s glory with the holy angels.

We have been given but one prayer of Jesus and in it He emphasizes, from the very beginning, what is the essential aspect of prayer for Him as a model for our prayer, and it begins:

            Our Father Who art in heaven, HALLOWED BE THY NAME!

This is a most important lesson for us when many have lost respect for anything said to be holy.  Today, for example, some young people have no respect for the elderly, but idolise pop stars who are regularly doped and/or drunk.  Others will wholeheartedly cheer footballers who are paid many millions, but they jeer -- as fat cats -- business leaders who earn much less though providing work for many needy people.  Likewise, in family life today, parents are too frequently judged merely on the basis of their personal character, while children are over-indulged as children.  As a result, many young people judge their parents and show them little or no respect, while childhood is reckoned to excuse selfish, wild, and destructive behaviour.  That is quite wrong.  A mother or father is due respect from their children because of their parenthood even though, as persons, they may not be as good as they should be.  Obedience due to parents comes to an end with adulthood; respect for parents should never come to an end because they were instruments of God in the birth of their children, and as such, are holy.  Likewise, Mother Church, the holy Scriptures, priests and religious, the sacred vessels and the church building, all deserve respect in varying degrees, because they belong to God, they do God’s work or serve God’s purposes.

God’s love is ever warm to succour, His power is ever ready to save.  Today, we must remember, however, that there can be no justice among nations, no equity in society, no peace in our homes or in our hearts, when respect for God is ignored; when His institutions – e.g. marriage and the family – for human development and fulfilment, harmony in personal relations, and for order and  balance in the natural world, are all sacrificed on the altar of self-exaltation and worldly advantage, where personal, acceptable, pleasure, and spiritual ignorance, are the accepted criteria for popular living.

Nevertheless, despite all temporal trials, disappointments and setbacks, our Catholic aspirations and expectations, our Christian prayers, will not wilt with time, nor will they prove futile and false for, as our reading from the letter to the Hebrews assures us:

It is appointed that Christ, offered once to take away the sins of many, will appear a second tome, not to take away sin but to bring salvation to those who eagerly await Him.

                    (Adapted 2021)