3rd Sunday of Easter,Year C, 2013

3^rd. Sunday of Easter (C)

(Acts 5:27-32, 40b-41; Revelation 5:11-14; John 21:1-19)

The Apostle Thomas was the channel for our instruction last Sunday; this week it is Peter -- helped by John -- who will hopefully stimulate and encourage us to better understand, love, and respond to, Our Lord, as His true disciples in Mother Church and before the world.

Peter was a truly strong and undeniably impulsive character as we have just heard: 

When Simon Peter heard (from John) that it was the Lord, he tucked in his garment, for he was lightly clad, and jumped into the sea.  The other disciples came in the boat.

Jesus said to them, ‘Bring some of the fish you just caught,’ so Simon Peter went over and dragged the net ashore full of 153 large fish.  Even though there were so many, the net was not torn.

However, it is Jesus’ three-fold questioning of Peter that is the most striking and significant feature of the Gospel reading for us today:

      Simon, son of John, do you love Me? Do you love Me?  Do you love Me?

That insistence of Jesus is understood by many as His way of giving Peter the opportunity to revoke what had recently been his hasty, fear-driven, three-fold denial of Jesus.  Such a possibility cannot be denied.  And yet, since nothing is simple about Peter, it may be that here Jesus is showing respect for, and relating to, diverse aspects of Peter’s make-up.  For example, let us consider the very first question of Jesus:

      Simon, son of John, do you love Me more than these?

Peter was both head-strong and self-assertive; and yet, surely, Our blessed Lord was not inviting him there to assert that his own love of Jesus was greater than the love of all the other apostles present?  Peter did not and could not know the inner hearts and minds of his fellow-apostles to make such an assertion; and although he was -- as we have noted -- self-confident, he could not be said to have shown himself as arrogant.  It would seem, therefore, that Jesus was inviting and encouraging Peter to declare, in all truth and humility, that he loved Jesus more than he loved any one, or all, of the other apostles.   And why might Jesus have wanted such a declaration from Peter?   Well, as I said at the beginning, Peter was a truly strong and, should we say, ‘multi-layered’ character: he was a natural leader and a dominant personality, one whom his fellow apostles accepted unquestioningly as their spokesman, and frequently showed themselves ready, willing, and eager to follow in his personal initiatives.   Now that could, of itself, have insinuated into Peter’s psyche a certain vanity, and with it an accompanying reluctance to knowingly do or say anything that might put a strain on such a relationship of accepted dominance with regard to his fellow apostles. Now that might have been part of the motivation behind Jesus’ question, do you love Me more than these?  Moreover -- following the same line of thought -- there are, throughout the Gospel accounts, many instances of a particularly close personal relationship between Peter and John, which becomes most noticeable when, immediately after Peter’s protestation of supreme love in today’s Gospel:

      Lord, You know everything, You know that I love You,

Jesus had to make clear to him the implications, and insist on the prompt and full observance, of those words, for we are told that:

After signifying by what kind of death Peter would glorify God, Jesus said to him, ‘Follow Me.’ ..... Peter turned and saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following them; ... (and) he said to Jesus, ‘Lord, what about him?’  Jesus said, ’If it is My will that he remain until I come, what is that to you?  Follow Me.’

Nevertheless, there are other scholars who see in Jesus’ three-fold questioning of Peter a then recognized Oriental social procedure used before witnesses when conferring and confirming a ‘legal’ right that is, one fully approved and binding, on someone: 

            Feed My lambs; tend My sheep; feed My sheep.

Most probably, therefore, we have a remarkable instance of Jesus’ great and most compassionate wisdom: He wipes out the memory – in Peter’s own mind and in the minds of the other apostles – of Peter’s moment of weakness and shame and, at the same time, quite dramatically and most emphatically establishes him as head of His nascent Church in accordance with His Father’s manifest will.

Now there are also, in our Gospel reading, revealing words of Jesus relating to Peter’s future crucifixion:

Amen, amen, I say to you, when you were younger you used to dress yourself and go where you wanted; but when you grow old, you will stretch out your hands, and someone else will dress you and lead you where you do not want to go.

Jesus is there speaking the truth concerning Peter facing up to his death after years of labour and suffering for Jesus and the Church.  Many modern Catholics and Christians, however, are neither so truthful to themselves, understanding of others, or simple before God.  As moderns they are complicated by far too much self-love and fear of what people might think; and, augmenting such natural  tendencies and frailties, they may also have yielded far too much to the requirements of political correctness ... which all inevitably leads to a frequently observable and widespread tendency to pretence in matters of religious devotion.  Few would be willing to acknowledge in themselves the truth of Jesus’ words about Peter not wanting to go to his death for Jesus.

At this juncture, however, we should recognize that there is no question of Jesus implying that Peter would refuse to face up to his future crucifixion, only that Peter would not want to go; and, in that regard, we should recall that John tells us that:

 

Jesus said this signifying by what kind of death he (Peter) WOULD GLORIFY GOD.

Now, human pretence -- no matter how pious it may seem or present itself – ever glorifies God or truly recognizes Jesus.  Peter, as foreshadowed by Jesus, had -- in the intervening years of struggle for and service of the Church, and after countless hours of soul-opening prayer before God -- become both humble and patient to a degree that we find it difficult to imagine nowadays.  He would in no way seek to pretend to himself or to others that he wanted to go where his captors were leading him, and in this he was most sublimely close to and one with Jesus Whom he had personally witnessed, though uncomprehendly, praying to, struggling with, His heavenly Father and His own human nature in the Garden of Gethsemani.  How, indeed, did He now admire Jesus and glorify God!  For, only Jesus wanted, only Jesus could want – so wholeheartedly and eagerly – to walk to, go to, His crucifixion!

Oh! What wondrous love Jesus conceived for the coming sufferings of His crucifixion after His agony of blood-sweating-prayer in the Garden of Gethsemani!!  There He had fought in prayer with, before, and to, His beloved Father; and when His most beloved Father – after Jesus’ most urgent and ardent prayers -- still left the burden on His shoulders, He, Jesus, knew without any doubt, that He would FIND HIS FATHER in those coming crucifixion sufferings.  And that is why, when carrying His cross, He always -- after each individual fall on the way – endeavoured to get up in response to His Father’s call, totally oblivious to everything but His desire to love His Father to the utmost extremity of His living humanity!!

Peter was a most wonderful disciple of Jesus and he had come to find no difficulty in acknowledging, admitting, his own nothingness: of himself he did not want to go on that journey to his crucifixion because he did not love like Jesus the most beloved Son alone could love; but he most fully trusted in Jesus his brother and Saviour that He could and would draw him after Himself, that He would help him, Peter, humbly follow where Jesus his Lord alone could lead.

Dear People of God, let us most seriously pray for the simplicity of heart to admire Peter’ example; and, above all, for the Gift of the God’s Holy Spirit, that, of His great goodness and most subtle grace, we may embrace Jesus’ teaching and follow ever more closely His most precious example in giving praise and honour, glory and thanksgiving, to God supremely and solely.

Second Sunday of Easter Year C 2013

 2^nd. Sunday of Easter (C)

(Acts 5:12-16; Revelation 1:9-19; John 20:19-31)

On thinking about today’s Gospel reading it might seem strange that the risen Jesus should go to such lengths to prove to the apostle Thomas that He was no ghost, that He was a real man with flesh and bones and with blood cursing through His veins; glorified indeed -- had He had not just entered the room although the doors were closed? -- but nevertheless still recognizably real and objectively present to and with His apostles in the room:

Jesus said to Thomas, ‘Put your finger here and see My hands.  Reach out your hand and put it into My side.  Stop doubting and believe.

After doing so much for Thomas, why does Jesus today refrain from doing anything similar for modern people to prove that He is really with us?  We have to accept the truth about the reality of Jesus’ resurrection and presence to us, for us, and with us, by faith ... how come that Thomas got so much proof?

First of all notice that Thomas did indeed have faith.  A scientist seeing what Thomas saw might simply say, ‘There is something here I cannot understand, but science will be able to explain it later.  Indeed, if I could scientifically study this over a period of time in all its various and relevant aspects, I myself could probably explain it.  For the present I will just have to suspend judgement.’  That was not the attitude of Thomas: straightway he leapt from fact to faith when, after touching the wounds ... fact ... he immediately declared his faith ... with those momentous words:

            My Lord and my God!

Thomas’ sense of touch only confirmed what his eyes saw; and with those earthly eyes he did but see the wounds in Jesus’ hands and side, he did not, could not, see God.  It was the light of faith alone which enabled him to recognize the truth about Jesus and proclaim, My Lord and my God.

There is more to it, however, than simply that.  Something happened to the apostles when Thomas was absent, as we heard in the Gospel reading:

Jesus came and stood in the midst of the Apostles and said to them, ‘Peace be with you.  As the Father has sent Me, so I send you.’  And when He had said this, He breathed on them and said to them, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit.  Whose sins you forgive are forgiven them, and whose sins you retain are retained.’

Up till then the Eleven, had been a group of individuals, united indeed by their love of Jesus, but still a more or less ordinary group capable of breaking up and each going their own way as when Jesus was apprehended.  However, when the Risen Jesus appeared to them -- in Thomas’ absence -- He gave them a distinctive and exclusive mission, As the Father has sent Me, so I send you, after which He bestowed on them the Gift of His own most Holy Spirit with power to forgive and retain sins, as you have just heard.   After that moment those ten apostles in the room with Jesus were no longer ten individuals, friends, all interested in and concerned about Jesus’ end, they had been formed into an enduring unity of unique significance and universal consequence for mankind’s salvation: the CHURCH.  When Thomas originally, and despite what the other Apostles and Mary said, refused to believe until he himself had seen and touched the wounds of Jesus, he knew little or nothing about the Church ... he only knew a group of certain individual friends of Jesus, each with their own hopes and fears, sorrows and longings, each with their very personal and at times quite obvious limitations and failings.  That is why Thomas needed -- and was given by his Lord and God -- that extra help that we today are not offered because we have something still better, we have the witness of that Church established by Jesus; and, in her, we are become members of His very own Body empowered and ennobled by His Holy Spirit Who has washed away the sins that would prevent us from truly recognizing, and overcome the frailties that would impede us from fully loving and serving, Jesus. 

The Church, God’s Chosen People, is, as I have said, the Body of Christ, the  Temple where Jesus has promised to be -- for our finding -- until the end of time; she is the Spouse He will never desert, and the loving Mother of all God’s children born in baptism, through faith in Jesus as sent by the heavenly Father, and by the gift of His most Holy Spirit.  Her sacraments give us the food of life; while the word of Jesus -- alive in her -- is for a light to the nations and the glory of all God’s children.

Poor Thomas!  On being told of the first apparition of Jesus to the assembled disciples in the gospel he was only an individual human being ... we, on the other hand, are so blessed: being members of the Church, having her witness to the truth and the abiding presence of Jesus her Head, with her sacraments channelling for us and accomodating to us the power of His Spirit.  At that moment, Thomas’ refusal was blunt and absolute – a true expression of his personal character – nevertheless, when subsequently, on his own, he had the time and opportunity to think things over, he must have become deeply conscious of the separation between himself and his hitherto mutually committed friends and companions, and how he must have longed to be able to share their new found peace and strength drawn from this so-called Risen Lord Whom he himself could not, as yet, fully embrace.  This longing was indeed God’s prompting that would prepare him to embrace his second opportunity when Jesus once again appeared to all Eleven of His apostles ... an opportunity for which Thomas had been humbly seeking in his heart and mind, an occasion when his touching of Jesus’ wounds prompted and Jesus’ words encouraged him to a total personal commitment of faith towards the Risen Lord he had long loved.

For faith is -- as the Compendium of our Catechism teaches -- the supernatural virtue which is necessary for salvation; it is, indeed, a free gift of God accessible to all who humbly seek it.  The act of faith is a truly human act, an act of the intellect of a human person who, prompted and encouraged by God, freely assents to divine truth revealed by God and proclaimed by Mother Church.  Faith is certain and works through charity.  It is, even now, a foretaste of the joys of heaven; and how this very occasion of today’s celebration evokes such joy for us because one called, at times, ‘doubting Thomas’ should so manifestly provoke and lead us to such great appreciation of and joy in the Church and the Faith as is ours today!!

Yes we Catholics rejoice in Mother Church and our Faith, two supremely wonderful and complementary gifts of God.  Our faith is indeed a joy because it is SURE when so much in life is belittled and betrayed by insecurity ... life-long love and enduring commitment and fidelity between man and wife is hardly expected today and, indeed, frequently mocked in so many presentations of modern life in society where personal gain and pleasure, public approval or even mere acceptance or tolerance, are more than enough to tip the scales against any prospective possibility of sacrifice.   For intellectual, or even religiously-inclined people, Catholic faith can be deemed impossible because the world and our knowledge of it are changing so rapidly that no one can know what time may bring.  One former Christian acquaintance of mine, thus afflicted, could not say, when asked about the divinity of Jesus, what he might ‘believe’ in ten years’ time.  Consequently, for so many, instead of the sure light of faith guiding towards the fulfillment of our human destiny and the abiding promise of a God-given future, there is only an individual, or at best shared, opinion; available, not indeed to guide onwards, but merely to hopefully justify past, personal, options.  There is no love in-and-through life, just adventitious adaptations to whatever might seem the best available personal option.

Catholic Faith, because it is founded on the Word of God, is both sure and certain: it is essential for salvation because it alone can respond fittingly to the great Goodness of God and the sublimity of His promises made to mankind in Jesus.  Even though, for example, one can still read past issues of national and international papers recounting the wonders witnessed by thousands at Fatima and Lourdes, even though pilgrims still today experience startling cures at those and similar shrines, nevertheless every new generation wants to experience for itself so much that, without such corroborating personal experience, the reports of others gradually lose compelling attention and are, inevitably forgotten or simply no longer taken into account.  Faith alone can respond to and overcome such depradations of our human character by time and cupidity.

People of God, there is so much truth and beauty brought to our attention today – I have not even mentioned the wonderful promptings of God spoken of in the Catechism, promptings that speak directly to individual hearts and minds, that relate to individual and secret needs, hopes and aspirations! – so much for which time and space cannot supply, but for which sincere gratitude to the God of our Faith, and thanks to Thomas and the apostolic proclamation of our Mother Church, must provide our present comfort and consolation, our abiding hope and longing,  our inspiration and delight in Jesus.  

           

Resurrection of Our Lord, Easter Day 2013

The Resurrection of Our Lord (C)

(Acts 10:34, 37-43; Colossians 3:1-4; John 20:1-9)

Today’s readings give, directly, the Good News of Jesus’ glorious resurrection from the dead, and, indirectly, a picture of the Church and her Scriptures, a picture that is both admirable and reassuring.

Let us look at the Gospel first which says much – relatively speaking – about the Apostles Peter and John, and about the appearance, the condition, of the tomb with its remaining contents, along with a passing mention of Mary Magdalen and the previously opened (by whom?) entrance to the tomb.  Of Jesus Himself, however, there is nothing at all apart from the statement that His Body was not to be found in the tomb.  In fact, all that we are told about what might have happened to Jesus is to be deduced from the closing passage:

They did not yet understand the Scripture that He had to rise from the dead.

Now none of that is very surprising to us who believe, because we know and appreciate that the Resurrection was a supernatural and transcendentally holy occurrence to serve God’s glory and mankind’s salvation, not an intriguingly mysterious event staged for the titillation or satisfaction of human curiosity.  Let us therefore turn our attention to what we are told, directly, about the Apostles Peter and John (as we presume) and indirectly about holy Mother Church, her Scriptures, and her proclamation of Jesus.

On hearing from Mary Magdalen about the empty tomb Peter and the other disciple went to see for themselves:

They both ran, but the other disciple ran faster than Peter and arrived at the tomb first; he bent down and saw the burial cloths there, but did not  go in.   When Simon Peter arrived after him, he went into the tomb and saw the burial cloths  there and the cloth that had covered his head not with the burial cloths but rolled up in a separate place. 

The ‘other disciple’ (John) being younger than Peter was quicker to the tomb into which he glanced; but, out of respect for Peter, he did not enter until Peter himself had arrived and gone first -- as head of the nascent Church – into the tomb of the Lord and Master Who had purposely chosen him for that role.  John then entered after Peter.

That order of precedence is important because some have tried to use the following words of the Gospel account to the detriment of Peter:

Then the other disciple also went in, the one who had arrived at the tomb first, and he saw and believed.

Some have picked up, carpingly, on the fact that John is reported to have both ‘seen and believed’, whereas of Peter it is only said that ‘he saw’.  This ‘enhancing of John’ at Peter’s expense is shown in other ways by those who would say that John showed the greater courage at Jesus’ trial by going into the High Priest’s house while Peter remained, fearfully, outside; and, of course, John, alone of the Apostles, stood by Jesus’ cross on Calvary with Mary.   None of this special pleading, however, in any way detracts from Peter or disturbs the faithful who remember that John was still a young man who could lean on Jesus’ breast at the Supper, someone whom the Temple guards or Roman soldiers would not in any way have regarded as a possible threat, whereas Peter was well known to have a sword which he had already, not long ago, used in an attempt to defend Jesus.  As a result, the fully adult and manifestly strong and capable Peter was under far greater threat at the trial and thereafter than John. 

When Simon Peter arrived, he went into the tomb and saw the burial cloths there and the cloth that had covered his head not with the burial cloths but rolled up in a separate place.

Then the other disciple also went in, the one who had arrived at the tomb first, he saw and believed.

There, I believe, we have further evidence of the difference between Peter and John, between the humanly, fully mature, man, and the gentle youth John.  John ... the great mystic among the Apostles, and the future author of the supremely spiritual Gospel ... was ‘youthfully’ (not, however, wrongly) impressed by the atmosphere of the tomb and what he saw there: the cloth that had been used -- out of respect for the deceased -- to prevent the bottom jaw from sagging, was carefully rolled up in it’s own place  separate from the other cloths; and it is not outlandish to guess that a young person like John, one with mystic inclinations, might see and appreciate much in that separately-positioned cloth, much that would impress him and stir him to deeply consider and further contemplate the ‘never-to-be-silenced’ aspect of Jesus’ Good News.

Peter, on the other hand, as head of the Church, and already graced for that supremely responsible role, carefully weighed up what he found in the tomb and what he did not find there.  He then went away and recalled what Jesus had said and done since he had known Him, and what the Jewish Scriptures had foretold about the coming Messiah.   Again and again he went over all these considerations together with what he had seen in the empty tomb, he prayed and prayed -- ever so much – in order to appreciate how all these might fit together into the one whole, and essential, truth about Jesus.

 

Thanks to our second reading today we have the result of Peter’s thinking, for there he proclaims the Gospel, the Good News about Jesus, in the name of the Church and at the ‘command of God’:

(Cornelius said) All of us are here in the presence of God to listen to all that the Lord has commanded you to say. (Acts 10:33)

Peter then went on to give his summary of the Good News about Jesus in these few and precise words:

He went about doing good and healing those oppressed by the devil; they put Him to death by hanging Him on a tree; THIS MAN GOD RAISED ON THE THIRD DAY; God granted that He be visible to us, the witnesses chosen by God in advance, who ate and drank with Him after HE ROSE FROM THE DEAD; He commissioned us to preach and testify that He is the one appointed by God as judge of the living and the dead; to Him all the prophets bear witness that everyone who believes in Him will receive forgiveness through His name.

There, People of God, you can see and appreciate the wonder of Jesus pictured and officially proclaimed by Mother Church through Peter: with the Resurrection of Jesus as the centre-piece, the absolutely essential centre-piece indeed, but nevertheless, a piece that fits into and binds together an even more wonderful and coherent mosaic of divine truth giving most sublime expression to divine goodness, love, wisdom, and mercy for the whole of sinful mankind through all the ages.

John, the mystic, the contemplative, learnt and revealed most beautiful and intimate truths of the relationship of sublime love between Jesus and His Father; truths in which one can immerse oneself: not to proudly investigate and criticise, imitate, or grasp for oneself, but, most humbly and gratefully to admire, and hopefully -- of God’s great goodness and gift – thereby to absorb something of the Spirit.

But for the whole picture, in all its majestic embrace of mankind’s needs and possibilities under the Providence of God’s infinite wisdom, goodness and truth ... look to Peter and the proclamation of Mother Church, passed down to us and interpreted, today, by Paul the most providential link between the wisdom of the Old and the revelation of the New Testaments and our own guide -- as Doctor of the Nations -- to the Church’s doctrinal fullness of truth, and the inspired and inspiring channel of her heavenly spirituality:

Brothers and sisters, if then you were raised with Christ, seek what is above, where Christ is seated at the right hand of God.  Think of what is above, not of what is on earth.  For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God.  When Christ your life appears, then you too will appear with Him in glory.

    

             

                       

---

^

^