If you are looking at a particular sermon and it is removed it is because it has been updated.

For example Year C 2010 is being replaced week by week with Year C 2013, and so on.

Thursday 4 February 2016

5th Sunday of Year C 2016



5th. Sunday of Year (C) 


                                        (Isaiah 6:1-8; 1st. Corinthians 15:1-11; Luke 5:1-11)

 Today, dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ, we should learn from our Scriptural readings something about the spiritual life of a Christian: something essential for any would-be-faithful disciple of Christ, something quite distinct from the good Christian life commonly and condescendingly lauded by the world around us.
In our Gospel reading we heard that:
Jesus said to Simon, "Do not be afraid. From now on you will be catching men."
Just as Simon and his companions used a net to catch fish, so Jesus would, He said, use Simon and his companions to catch men.
Notice that People of God, because many today dislike the thought of salvation being mediated to them by other human beings, they object to the idea of owing their salvation to God’s goodness in Christ and through the Church: they want to have a direct personal relationship with God or with Jesus the Saviour.  They think that in their case God should catch them as does some fresh-water fisherman who goes to the edge of the river and feeling under the rocks or the bank catches hold of one fish in his hand: that is how God personally seeks and saves them, they would like to think.  They cannot stomach a Church, Peter’s Church, a human organisation, being used, like some vast net, to catch them along with numberless others over the ages.  They do not want to feel, let alone express, humble gratitude before a universal Mother Church, and they are positively unwilling to obey any Church authority exercised by human beings such as the Pope, the bishops and, indeed, so-called ‘superiors’ of any kind.  And yet, it cannot be denied that Jesus did, indeed, say to Simon:
            Do not be afraid; from now on you will be catching men;
or, even more explicitly, on a later occasion:
Amen, amen, I say to you, whoever receives the one I send receives Me, and whoever receives Me receives the one Who sent Me.    (John 13:20)
That refusal of many to accept the One True Church of Christ, their denial of Peter, established by Jesus as the Rock of the Church and the Shepherd of His sheep, is an expression of the human and worldly pride of modern man, and a prominent characteristic of the false religious spirit abroad in our times.  There are other aspects too that our readings clarify for us today, aspects no less harmful to the true Christian spirit, no less destructive of life with and for God in Jesus.
In the first reading we heard how Isaiah had the remarkable vision of God in the glory of His holiness and majesty:
I saw the Lord seated on a high and lofty throne, with the train of His garment filling the temple.  Seraphim were stationed above.  One cried out to the other, "Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts!  All the earth is filled with His glory!"
That would be enough to fill most human beings with awesome fear and humble reverence; however, we are told that Isaiah:
heard the voice of the Lord, saying: "Whom shall I send?  Who will go for Us?"  "Here I am,” (he) said, “send me!" 
Does that not seem to be somewhat presumptuous on the part of Isaiah?
Let us now turn to St. Paul and observe his behaviour, for he tells us that:
Jesus appeared to Cephas, then to the Twelve.  After that, He appeared to more than five hundred brothers at once, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. After that He appeared to James, then to all the apostles.  Last of all, as to one born abnormally, He appeared to me.
Now, some of the Corinthians to whom Paul was writing were inclined to denigrate him: who was he, after all?  Everybody knew about Peter individually and the group of Twelve Apostles who travelled far and wide spreading the Gospel, and then, of course, there was James the brother of the Lord and head of the Church in Jerusalem.  Who was this fellow Paul in comparison with them?  As you heard, Paul was the first to admit that he did not have the supreme authority of Peter, nor was he one of the original Twelve.  But whatever his detractors might say or think, Paul would not shrink before them: he confidently asserted, “Jesus, appeared to me also “.   And not only did He appear to Paul, He also chose to send Paul on a mission.  In other words, he, Paul, was indeed an Apostle, one sent by the risen Lord to proclaim the Gospel: and he had been sent to the Gentiles, to Corinth, with that Good News.  “No matter what some of you may think”, he was saying to the Corinthians, “I am an Apostle, indeed, I am your Apostle”
Even if you should have countless guides to Christ, yet you do not have many fathers; for I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel.                                 (1 Corinthians 4:15)
So in our readings today we have not only Isaiah pushing himself forward “Send me!” but also Paul fighting strongly to have himself recognised and accepted as an Apostle of Christ and on a par with the Twelve.
This was most important for Paul because, even in the very early Church, it was the Twelve who were, then as now, acknowledged to be of supreme importance.  ‘All the apostles’, were those disciples of Jesus who had seen the Risen Lord (cf. 1st. Corinthians 15:7), and had subsequently been sent (‘apostle’ means “one sent”) on Gospel missions.  In the beginning of his work Paul had been sent on his first missionary voyage together with Barnabas by the Spirit in and through the church at Antioch.  But it was Paul himself who had subsequently been directly commissioned and personally guided by the Spirit to set out on his second missionary journey with Silas as his chosen companion, before later undertaking his third and final mission.
Paul did not want to be thought of then or remembered later on as merely one just sent  out by and on behalf of the church of Antioch: he was, he insisted, a true, a full, Apostle.  For, he had – despite his own unworthiness as a persecutor of the Church – originally been chosen by the Risen Lord Jesus Himself to proclaim and suffer for His Name, before being expressly sent by the Spirit of Jesus on his second and third journeys; indeed, on all three journeys, the Gospel he preached and the authority he exercised came from the Risen Lord.  In defence of his missionary standing he even went on, in his second letter to these Corinthians, to sing loudly -- but most affectingly -- his own praises as he compared himself with all other apostles, whoever they might be, the Twelve or any others accorded the title ‘apostle’ in the Church at that time:
Are they ministers of Christ? -- I am talking like an insane person -- I am still more, with far greater labours, far more imprisonments, far worse beatings, and numerous brushes with death. (2 Corinthians 11:23)
People of God, today the popular conception of Jesus and of a ‘good’ Christian is of someone who is nice, never nasty, never pushy, never fighting for self in any way; always smiling at children and patting dogs, always speaking soothing words and totally incapable of condemning sin or punishing evil-doers.  In other words, the world’s picture of a virtuous Christian is colourless, insipid and negative, in which the Gospel is robbed of its unique and most sublime beauty, of all its inspiration to challenge and power to sustain and fulfil.  Even the good works done for others become tasteless, because they are human good deeds done for human satisfaction.  And since they are not directed towards God’s glory they remain within the orbit of this world; and though they be reproduced over and over again they cannot renew the world … and ultimately are condemned to become ordinary and meaningless, just as the words “I forgive” become trite when they are not spoken in prayer to God (“Father, forgive them”), but rather offered meaninglessly to those who are not in any way either interested in, or asking for, forgiveness.
Since I am saying that the comfortable picture of a ‘good’ life painted by lovers of this world is insipid, do I thereby say that Catholics and Christians should become extremists or try to make themselves interesting or unusual?  By no means!  Let us look again at Isaiah and Paul. 
In the first reading, the apparently “pushy” Isaiah had had his sin taken away, as he tells us:
One of the seraphim (from before God’s throne) flew to me, holding an ember which he had taken with the tongs from the altar.  He touched my mouth with it.  “See,” he said, "now that this has touched your lips; your wickedness is removed, your sin purged."
So you can begin to appreciate that Isaiah had – most probably -- been in no sense pushy: God had prepared Him for the work and so Isaiah was able to cry out with both deep gratitude and confident zeal in answer to God’s inspiring call.
Look again at St. Paul.  He was fighting to establish his own authority indeed, but only so that the Gospel truth for which he had been commissioned as Apostle to the Gentiles just as Peter was Apostle to the Jews (cf. Galatians 2:7), might not be brought into doubt by others who had more attractive worldly credentials or who were preaching a version of the Gospel which was dependent on the old Jewish understanding whilst failing to appreciate and fully respond to the new wine of the Gospel of Christ.  Therefore, Paul was not really fighting for himself, he was fighting for the Gospel entrusted to him by the Risen Lord, the full Gospel for his new converts whom he would not allow to be saddled with the old, worn out, Jewish prescriptions; he was, indeed, fighting for the truth of Christ, the glory of God the Father, and the spiritual fulfilment of his hearers.
Our readings today, People of God, encourage and guide us to authentic spirituality as disciples of Jesus.  We are not to conform to, settle for, the flabby, colourless, “goodness” of those who want to win the approval of modern society and accommodate modern morals, and who want, above all, to avoid the Cross of Christ.  Yet neither are we to seek to make a name for ourselves, striving to be dynamic and contradictory, flaunting authority, and ignoring normal sensibilities.  No, we have to despise both those attitudes: we must not be so weak as to seek the world’s good pleasure; we must not be so proud as to seek our own glory and set our own standards.
Zeal for God and self-forgetfulness, as displayed by Isaiah, easily lead to the world’s mockery, disdain, and contempt; faithfulness to God and courage, as shown by St. Paul, frequently bring down upon themselves criticism, antagonism, and confrontation.
At the very beginning of His own public ministry Our Blessed Lord made abundantly clear for His specially chosen disciples the attitude they should have with Him, in His service:
Getting onto one of the boats -- the one belonging to Simon -- He asked him to put out a short distance from the shore.  Then He sat down and taught the crowds from the boat.  After He had finished speaking, He said to Simon, ‘Put out into deep water and lower your nets for a catch.’  Simon said in reply, ‘Master we have worked hard all night and have caught nothing, but at Your command I will lower the nets.’   When they had done this, they caught a great number of fish and their nets were tearing.  They signalled to their partners in the other boat to come to help them.  They came and filled both boats so the boats were in danger of sinking.  When Simon Peter saw this he fell at the knees of Jesus and said, ‘Depart from me, Lord, for I am a sinful man.’
Humble acceptance of their own insufficiency, simple confidence and sure trust in His guidance and command, and deepest personal gratitude for His Personal love, such were dispositions of the Apostles who left everything and followed Jesus.
Such dispositions were taught by Jesus at the beginning of His relationship with His specially chosen disciples; and they were most firmly anchored in their minds and hearts when, as St. John tells us, – at the end of their earthly relationship with Him and in His hour of supreme glory -- the Risen Lord appeared to them by the Sea of Tiberias where He found them once again fishing without success: He confirmed His original teaching, foreshadowing still greater fruitfulness for their future labours, and offering the surest hope of unfailing help and eternal reward.
Dear People of God, in all things we should seek to know, love, and obey Jesus. The mode and measure of our holiness is not ours to produce in compliance with human conceptions, but His to give according to His unsearchable wisdom, inconceivable beauty, and supreme goodness. 

                                                                      




       

Friday 29 January 2016

4th Sunday of Year C 2016



 4th. Sunday (Year C)      
 (Jeremiah 1:4-5, 17-19; 1st. Corinthians 12:31 – 13:13; Luke 4:21-30)


In our first reading it would seem that Jeremiah was somewhat frightened on being given the role of prophet by the Lord:
The word of the Lord came to me, saying: "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you; before you were born I dedicated you; a prophet to the nations I appointed you."
And, despite his protestations of youth:
            Ah, Lord GOD!   I do not know how to speak.  I am too young!"
he needed to be most authoritatively told:
Prepare yourself; stand up and tell them all that I command you.  For I am the one Who today makes you a fortified city, a pillar of iron, a wall of bronze, against the whole land: against Judah’s kings and princes, its priests and the people of the land.
You can appreciate therefore the traditional Catholic conviction that when God chooses someone for a special work of whatever sort – and despite their own possible misgivings and fears -- He always prepares and enables them to do that for which He is choosing them. 
Let us now turn our attention to Jesus Himself coming to a public awareness and acknowledgement of the task for which He had been sent by His Father:
The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because He has anointed Me to bring glad tidings to the poor; He has sent Me to proclaim liberty to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free; and to proclaim a year acceptable of the Lord.

But Jesus’ Personal understanding of His calling must surely be judged not simply by noting the words of Scripture which, after having read them, Jesus declared that they were being fulfilled that very moment, but also by the way He then set about to prepare Himself for the work before Him.  
We are told that, on ending the reading from the prophet, Jesus then went on to speak in such a way that:
When the people in the synagogue heard this, they were all filled with fury.  They rose up, drove Him out of the town, and led Him to the brow of the hill on which their town had been built, to hurl Him down headlong. But Jesus passed through the midst of them and went away.
What a contrast with those prophetic words He had just read!
But make no bones about it, People of God, Jesus did not inspire such anger and resentment by a slip of the tongue so to speak, or in an outburst of sudden anger or irritation.  Not at all!  He appears to have been deliberately provocative for a reason befitting Him Who as Lord was coming to His own and finding them manifestly not as He would have them:
Surely you will quote Me this proverb, 'Physician, cure yourself,’ and say, ‘Do here in Your native place the things that we heard were done in Capernaum.'"  And He said, "Amen, I say to you, no prophet is accepted in his own native place.”
To impugn in such a way the personal pique of those present might have been deemed enough, but no, Jesus went straight on to infuriate them further by attacking their national pride:
Indeed, I tell you, there were many widows in Israel in the days of Elijah, when the sky was closed for three and a half years, and a severe famine spread over the entire land.  It was to none of  these that  Elijah was sent but only to a widow in  Zarephath,  in  the

land of Sidon.  Again, there were many lepers in Israel during the time of Elisha the prophet, yet not one of them was cleansed but only Naaman the Syrian.
Once more, I want you to contrast the peace of that gentle mission of comfort and salvation, foretold and expressed in those prophetic words accepted and acknowledged by Jesus, with this deliberate ‘taking on’ of those of His hearers whose personal pique had led them to overtly observe, “Isn’t this the son of Joseph?”, before then going on to bluntly accuse His hearers as a whole for their excessive national pride as Israelites as distinct from what should have been a humble awareness of their true glory as a People chosen and prepared by God to hear, reverence, and respond to, His most holy Word.
How are such contrasting, indeed apparently contradictory, attitudes in Our Lord to be reconciled?   For reconciled they must be if we are to have a true understanding and appreciation of Our Saviour, His work for us, and our duties in His service. 
Such a reconciliation is not often sought because the problem is too frequently swept under the carpet so to speak -- as for example, in this case -- by ignoring the living activity of Jesus Himself and over-emphasizing the prophetic vision.   Today, it is commonly imagined that people ought to be cajoled by fellowship and sympathy into trying-out some version of Christianity or perhaps even Christian Catholicism to test it -- as it were for comfort and fit -- rather than their being made aware of the privilege of being called and offered the opportunity to give themselves in self-surrender and gratitude to the inspiration of  God’s promises of forgiveness and fulfilment together with the challenge of walking daily with Jesus, along His way of the Cross, in the power of His most Holy Spirit.
Jesus always maintained the comprehensive attitude: His words and actions could be hard as well as gentle: He would help but never cajole, He wanted obedience not popularity; for He had come to redeem not to excuse, to gently raise human beings above their present limitations and

weaknesses – call to mind His dealings with Jeremiah recorded for us in our first reading -- not to smother their aspirations or paralyse their efforts by oodles of very human sympathy.
I have come to set the earth on fire, and how I wish it were already blazing! (Luke 12:49)
Do not think that I have come to bring peace upon the earth. I have come to bring not peace but the sword.  For I have come to set a man ‘against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and one's enemies will be those of his household.'  Whoever loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me, and whoever loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me, and whoever does not take up his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for My sake will find it.   (Matthew 10:34-39)
Holiness in Jesus was absolutely and sublimely serious: not to be manifested by carefully chosen and publicly appreciable and acceptable tokens such as sympathetic gestures or emotional words; for Him holiness was simply and solely, totally and wholly, Personal:  divine love, burning charity towards His Father, expressed on earth by His absolute dedication to His Father’s glory and the fulfilment of His Father’s will for our salvation.  We, however, so very often, in order to fit Jesus into the weakness of our understanding and the flabbiness of our presentation of holiness restrict the supreme fullness of His work and words to what is easily digestible by all; popular sensitivities must not be offended, worldly comfort and harmony should not in any way be disturbed.
Today, as St. Paul declared:
            We know in part and we prophesy in part;
however, we do this, not as a result of our innocent and truly human inadequacy before the sublimely awesome yet wondrous reality of God, as confessed by Paul, but knowingly and

wilfully because we too often seek for what is ultimately worldly not heavenly, and this procedure is supremely exemplified by the popular use and almost ‘canonization’ of the word ‘love’ originally used to translate that other, more Christian, word: ‘charity’.  Charity is divine, being the life-flow between Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.  We, in baptism and confirmation receive it as a gift from God, a share in His way of loving, a share enabling us live as His children, to form one Family to the glory of His Name, in the likeness of Jesus by the power of the Spirit.  Our understanding of this Gift of Charity, however, has become twisted and demeaned by repeated and increasingly cheap use of the translation, ‘love’, a word that should be supremely honourable indeed as shown in Paul’s description of it – as caritas, charity -- in our second reading, but one which is blatantly open to and available for the blasphemous justification of all kinds of degrading lust and licence which are essentially unchristian.
People of God, the devil once entered into open combat with Jesus in the desert after He had received John’s baptism in the Jordan: that battle the devil lost and he never forgot the experience, which is why he never enters into open conflict with Jesus in the Church.  However, he is still and always the enemy and the deceiver, and so he prefers to have Jesus proclaimed partially, insinuating here and omitting there, always and in every way trying -- as the deceiver and liar that he is – to lead Christians astray first of all, that he might ultimately destroy them.  Today he continues his insinuations and in that way seeks to destroy the image of Jesus in mankind by hiding the fullness of the glory of the Lord or the majesty of the Son of Man in favour of a sugary, plaster-cast, likeness meant to temporarily indulge human weaknesses at the cost of blunting mankind’s divine potentialities. And his most useful supporters are contemporary former Christians and government members seeking to justify – by their use of Christian terminology -- themselves and their policies which promote by means of ‘ersatz’ goodness (there is no right and wrong, no power of evil, everything open and subject to human judgement) their own desire to continue in popularity and power; and also all those of learning


who know so much about things and so little about themselves, who know so much about  the experience of  life and so little about  its ultimate purpose, value, and fulfilment that they think themselves able and justified to meddle in and with it. 
Today, People of God, we need to remember the words of God addressed to Jeremiah:
They will fight against you, but not prevail over you, for I am with you to deliver you –oracle of the LORD.
Those are words suited to our situation today.
We are called to live in Mother Church in such a way as to be able to drink deeply of the new wine that is hers in abundance; for our destiny as Catholics and Christians in this world is not of this world, since its ultimate fulfilment will be an eternal sharing in heavenly reality and divine fulfilment … in Jesus, by the Spirit, for the Father.  Our ultimate destiny is the holiness of sharing in Divine Charity for eternity.  Today, it is popularly thought, that holiness is some optional extra for Christians, that needs to be popularized and promoted -- as being, on the whole, easy and rewarding -- when dealing with people who have difficulty understanding how what is intangible and invisible can be both truly real, and worth-their-while making a serious effort to attain it.
We have, therefore, as St. Paul said, to learn adult ways:
When I was a child, I used to talk as a child, think as a child, reason as a child, when I became a man, I put aside childish things;
and this we can do only by looking once again at the whole Jesus.  We must not allow ourselves to look at Him through the world’s eyes which only see what they are wanted to see.  We must see the fullness of Him and love Him in that fullness: gentle and strong, understanding and demanding, inviting and rejecting; totally devoted to us and totally opposed to the reality of sin.


We must seek Him in the whole of the Scriptures not just in some few selected and popular passages or quotes in the national press; we must understand Him in line with the fullness of Mother Church’s witness to Him, and serve Him according to the Spirit we received in baptism, not yielding to the clamour of undisciplined human nature or the propensities of the sinful world.
Do not work for food that perishes but for the food that endures for eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For on Him the Father, God, has set His seal.” So they said to Him, “What can we do to accomplish the works of God?”  Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in the One He sent.”  (John 6:27–29)
            Then we shall know fully, as we are fully known.