23rd.
Sunday Year (C)
(Wisdom 9:13-18; Letter to
Philemon 9-10, 12-17; Luke 14:25-33)
Onesimus, though not a Christian, had hoped to gain some advantage by persuading an honoured Christian teacher, Paul of Tarsus, to intercede with Philemon, a Christian, whose slave he was. Onesimus’ initial confidence in his owner’s friend and “partner” clearly bore fruit, for Paul, having first guided him to become a Christian, then offered to make good whatever loss Philemon might have suffered by Onesimus’ flight. On this basis, Paul appealed to Philemon to receive his slave back into his household as he would receive Paul himself.
Neither Greek nor Roman slavery was usually a permanent state. Most commonly, an owner granted freedom to a faithful slave as a reward for his or her work and loyalty; this was frequently done through the owner’s will at death. While owners could punish disloyal slaves by including in their wills a clause prohibiting their heirs from ever letting such slaves go, there is also much evidence that others, while still living, had a variety of reasons for choosing to set free some of their slaves, not infrequently about the age of thirty. Thus the question regarding Onesimus was most likely when, not if, Philemon planned to set him free.
The main features distinguishing 1st century slavery from that later practiced in the New World are the following: racial factors played no role; education was greatly encouraged (some slaves were better educated than their owners) and it enhanced a slave’s value; many slaves carried out sensitive and highly responsible social functions; slaves could own property (including other slaves!); their religious and cultural traditions were the same as those of the freeborn; no laws prohibited public assembly of slaves; and (perhaps above all) the majority of urban and domestic slaves could legitimately anticipate becoming free persons.
You will have noticed, I am sure,
that Paul, in our second reading, was not like our modern "human
rights" promoters and protagonists.
Neither was Peter in his first letter where he writes (2:18-21):
Servants, be submissive to
your masters with all fear, not only to the good and gentle, but also to the
harsh. For this is commendable: if,
because of conscience toward God, one endures grief suffering wrongfully. For what credit is it if, when you are beaten
for your faults, you take it patiently? But when you do good and suffer -- if
you take it patiently -- this is commendable before God. For to this you were called, because Christ
also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that you should follow His steps.
Now, I do not in any way wish to
detract from the noble work done by many good people for the human rights of
the underprivileged and needy, however, there is something we should understand
about the unwillingness of St. Paul, and indeed St. Peter, to adopt such an
attitude with regard to the public institution of slavery in the situation of
the early Church.
Perhaps we should note, first of
all and just in passing, that there are some people who will promote good
causes for reasons which, at times, are not so worthy as the causes they are
promoting. For example, some will
promote a good cause because, basically, they like a good fight, in which case
they are not so much promoters as protagonists; others love to see their own
ideas, their own opinions, prevail, and to that extent they promote others'
rights only in order to express their own ego, exert their own talents, or to
extend their own sphere of influence.
However, there are indeed many who
promote human rights from good motives and with the right intentions. Then why not Peter, why not Paul, with regard
to the social institution of slavery?
This is worth considering because we can perhaps learn, from both Peter
and Paul, why so much apparently being said and done today, nevertheless, and despite
many a fanfare of official praise and media proclamation, seems to bring forth
little or no good fruit. Surely it is one
of societies' most anxious questions today why so much apparently well-intentioned
legislation and so many, much-trumpeted, positive measures taken in society, are
seemingly quite unable to stem the slide into ever-greater indiscipline,
lawlessness, moral decadence, and even rank corruption?
In our Gospel reading you heard
Our Blessed Lord declare:
If anyone comes to Me without
hating his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, and even
his own life, he cannot be My disciple.
Our Blessed Lord unequivocally
demands that we put Him first in our lives.
And, indeed, since He only wants this in order that we might thereby be enabled
to live before God in Spirit and in Truth, and to love and serve each other
aright, He goes on to show the folly of those who would seek discipleship on
any other terms:
Whoever does not carry his
own cross and come after Me cannot be My disciple. Which of you, wishing to construct a tower,
does not first sit down and calculate the cost to see if there is enough for
its completion? Otherwise, after laying
the foundation and finding himself unable to finish the work, the onlookers
should laugh at him and say, 'This one began to build but did not have the
resources to finish.'
Jesus takes this stand because He
knows that if He Himself is not first in our lives, sin will, inevitably,
continue to rule there. And the empire
of sin is never stagnant. And when men -- ignoring or attempting to deny
the existence of personal and public sin -- pretend, of their own assumed wisdom
and presumed goodness, to prescribe remedies for deep social sicknesses, their tragic
misunderstanding of human nature only compounds the suffering by deepening
social confusion and anxiety, and fostering hopelessness and despair among individuals.
St. Peter and St. Paul, however,
faithfully put Jesus first, not only in the letters they wrote, but in their
whole life and work; above all, in their work of establishing the Church as the
Body of Christ. The Church was being
newly born, so to speak, into an alien world, and the very first thing Christians
had to understand was that, by living their new lives with unwavering faith in
Jesus and full confidence in the strength and inspiration of His most Holy
Spirit, they could now transcend and would ultimately transform their earthly
situation. This new, God-given faith –
being, as Jesus Himself put it, like the pearl of great price and the treasure
found with great joy in the field – was known by the Apostles to be of such
supreme value that they could in no way allow it to be subjected to worldly
considerations or made secondary to earthly values. For those blessed with the gift of faith even
the bonds of slavery could in no way be allowed to overshadow the joy of their
personal relationship with Christ or inhibit their commitment to, and
confidence in the power of, His Spirit in their lives; whereby, the lowest and
least fortunate, the most despised and worst abused, could work in and for the Church
as much and as well as all others, confident that their faith could empower
them to joyfully order their lives so as to bear effective witness to Christ and
bring about the ultimate triumph of His Spirit.
In those early Christian house-churches there was no distinction between
slaves and free, all were equally slaves of the Lord Jesus, and all were totally
committed to and equally important for the triumph of the Kingdom of God over
the pagan empire of Rome. Indeed, such
was their confidence that even direct opposition and persecution by the
imperial power came to be seen as no insuperable obstacle to the new Faith.
Nevertheless, that imperial power
could not be openly confronted, and therefore Peter and Paul , guided by the
Spirit of Jesus their Lord and Saviour, considered
it their main duty to teach Christian disciples how to rightly worship the
Father, and live each day by the light of Jesus’ Gospel truth in the power of
His Spirit, thus growing ever more calm and assured in their Christian
confidence and love.
And that, dear People of God, is
still of supreme importance for us modern disciples of Jesus; for, if our
Christian witness is to be effective before the world, He, Jesus, has to be
first in our lives, not our presumed good works, supposed social
influence, or desired personal popularity, :
Love the Lord your God with
all your Heart, and with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your
strength. This is the first commandment.
(Mk. 12:30-31)
At this, the most basic and most
important level, however, many Catholics are failing grievously today, for all
too often they go to Mass out of mere habit or, at best, to receive a little-understood
Communion. For those Christians envisaged by St. Paul and St. Peter, the
supreme reason for our attendance at Mass should always be a will to give
humble worship and most grateful praise and thanksgiving to God our Father by
personally offering ourselves with Jesus in the sacrifice of Holy Mass --
Mother Church’s re-presentation, for God’s People of today and all ages to come, of Jesus’ unique self-sacrifice on
Calvary -- by the Spirit of Jesus ever abiding in the her and refreshing us
anew at every such Mass, to the glory of God the Father.
Moreover, that intention to
worship the Father should always be imbued with and embrace a desire to know
Him and to follow Jesus ever better. That
is why, at Mass, the Scriptures are read and a homily given: because God's Word
is, as Jesus Himself said, our bread of life.
And yet, how many Catholics hardly listen to its solemn proclamation,
and make little effort appreciate a sermon, or address, given to explain it!
And so, the ultimate reason why
our modern society is failing, and why Government initiatives fall so short of
producing the sort of society we all want, is shown us by Our Lord's words at
the end of our Gospel reading:
Whoever of you does not forsake all that he has
cannot be My disciple.
Here Jesus is speaking as the
supreme doctor of human souls, seeking to find out what are the passions or possessions
that have over-powered and taken possession of us, and which always harm, gradually
lessen and demean, and ultimately seek to destroy, us.
There are, however, some disciples
of Jesus today who seem to be willing to endure hardship, suffering, and
opposition, and even to go so far as to hate their own life, for Jesus. And yet, despite all that, cling hard to
something that is still theirs, something that modern man and woman find most
difficult of all to give up, something which, for them, defines the essence of
their own personal identity and being: namely, their own opinion
and their own will.
So many apparently good Catholics,
good Christians, fail God, the Church, and indeed, themselves too, because,
deep down, everything has to pass the test of their own self-approval
and that of others; with the result that they feel the need, at every serious
juncture in their faith-life, to review once again their own belonging to Jesus
and His Church; to re-negotiate, so to speak, their own agreement with Him and
His Church; and only after significant hesitation will they feel themselves
able to accept anew the costs involved and signal their continuing but
conditional commitment. Now to such
people, Jesus declares without any concession:
No one, having put his hand
to the plough, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God. (Luke 9:62)
People of God, having ourselves been
most wonderfully blessed in Jesus and in the Church, and now being faced with
the ravages of sin bringing shame upon the Church and turmoil and catastrophic
suffering all over the world, we should strive to live our lives ever more and
more with Jesus for the Father.
Ultimately, the only life worth living for a human being is one of
loving gratitude and joyous commitment to the glory of God the Father, in union
with Jesus our Lord, under the rule and power of the Holy Spirit. Only by faithfully walking along that way can
we hope to find the fullness of being for which we long. As was said in the book of Wisdom:
(Only when You) sent your
Holy Spirit from on high, were the paths of those on earth made straight and people
learned what pleases you.
No comments:
Post a Comment